eXc: Nous aimons la liberté, l'état de droit, l'héritage des Lumières, la séparation de l'église et de l'état, l'humour. Nous n'aimons pas le fascisme, le communisme, l'antiaméricanisme, l'antisémitisme, le racisme, la bureaucratie, les totalitarismes. Nous estimons que le plus grave danger que courent les démocraties libérales est de céder à l'islamofascisme. Lire plus

Avant-gout d’un adminstration Obama ?

Posted on Mardi 10 juin 2008

Esperons que sa façon de gérer sa campagne n’est pas un avant-gout de sa façon de gérer le pays…

The Blog ( Weekly Standard):

Just because the Obama campaign doesn’t pay for cabs from O’Hare and staffers are expected to double-up at hotels doesn’t make it frugal. Indeed, Obama oversees a team of 700 people–more than twice as many as Bush in 2004–the biggest, most bloated campaign in the history of presidential elections:

So far in 2008, combined campaign-spending data for the three most recent months available–February, March and April–show that Sen. Obama outspent Sen. McCain 4.5-to-1 on staff salaries, more than 2-to-1 on office rents, and 25-to-1 on broadcast advertising, according to the Center for Responsive Politics.

Sen. Obama has about 700 employees on the payroll, scattered across 19 states. The McCain cadre is around 100, divided among a handful of local offices.

These hired guns aren’t going to deliver Obama the presidency. Having that many cooks in the kitchen is going to dilute his message and bleed him dry. With a burn rate of 114 percent, the Obama campaign won’t be able to maintain spending at primary levels even if fundraising were to remain constant–which is unlikely because so many Democratic donors have already given the maximum contribution.

Makes you wonder what kind of tax-and-spend operation Obama will run once he doesn’t have to depend on voluntary contributors to foot the bill. Also makes you wonder how biased the media must be that it would characterize the Obama campaign as lean and efficient when in reality it is desperate, spendthrift, and broke. Finally, makes you wonder how a guy who has raised all this money, won his party’s nomination, and received all this fawning attention for his historic achievement remains very nearly tied in the polls.

lagrette @ 20:05
Classé dans : Posts in English and Présidentielle américaine 2008
Global cooling : Ca coûte trop cher

Posted on Mercredi 4 juin 2008

Jonah Goldberg sur NRO  s’interesse au coût des mesures proposées par Kyoto pour réduire le rechauffement de la planète . Durant le 20 ème siècle la température moyenne s’est accrue de 0.7 degrés Celsius alors que le GDP  du monde a augmenté de 1800%, ce qui a permis à l’homme d’obtenir des progrès considérables à tous points de vue : aux USA l’esperance de vie est passée de 47 ans à 77 ans ce qui résume assez bien ces progrès.

Global Cooling Costs Too Much
There are no solutions in the realm of the politically possible.

By Jonah Goldberg

Public policy is all about trade-offs. Economists understand this better than politicians because voters want to have their cake and eat it too, and politicians think whatever is popular must also be true.

Economists understand that if we put a chicken in every pot, it might cost us an aircraft carrier or a hospital. We can build a hospital, but it might come at the expense of a little patch of forest. We can protect a wetland, but that will make a new school more expensive.

You get it already. But in the history of trade-offs, never has there been a better one than trading a tiny amount of global warming for a massive amount of global prosperity.

Earth got about 0.7 degrees Celsius warmer in the 20th century while it increased its GDP by 1,800 percent, by one estimate. How much of that 0.7 degrees can be laid at the feet of that 1,800 percent is unknowable, but let’s stipulate that all of the warming was the result of our prosperity and that this warming is in fact indisputably bad (which is hardly obvious).

That’s still an amazing bargain. Life expectancies in the United States increased from about 47 years to about 77 years. Literacy, medicine, leisure and even, in many respects, the environment have improved mightily over the course of the 20th century, at least in the prosperous West.

(Lire la suite…)

lagrette @ 16:31
Classé dans : Posts in English and Réchauffement et science
McCain - Pallin Ticket ?

Posted on Mardi 27 mai 2008

Sarah Pallin : C’est le gouverneur de l’Alaska depuis l’année dernière. Mère de 5 enfants ( elle vient de donner naissance au petit dernier), 43 ans, elle vient d’attaquer le gouvernement federal en justice au nom de l’Alaska pour avoir mis les ours polaires sur la liste des animaux en dangers d’extinction. Apparement elle est sur la “short list” des potentiels VP de McCain

Le nouveau Motto de l’Alaska : Coldest state, hottest gov…

lagrette @ 16:12
Classé dans : Présidentielle américaine 2008
Pour en finir avec l’affaire Al Dura

Posted on Mardi 27 mai 2008

 Trouvé sur MondesFrancophones

Par Luc Rosenzweig

La phase judiciaire de l’affaire “Charles Enderlin - France 2 - Al Dura” vient de connaître son aboutissement, le 21 Mai, avec l’arrêt de la Cour d’appel de Paris. Infirmant le jugement en première instance de la 17ème chambre du tribunal de Grande Instance, la Cour a débouté Charles Enderlin, chef du bureau de France 2 en Israël, et la direction de la chaîne dans les poursuites en diffamation engagées contre Philippe Karsenty. Ce dernier, sur son site internet “Média Rating” avait accusé Charles Enderlin et son cameraman Talal Abou Rahma d’avoir réalisé et diffusé les images de la prétendue mort, le 30 septembre à Gaza sous les balles israéliennes, d’un enfant, Mohammed Al Dura dans les bras de son père Jamal, ce dernier ayant été grièvement blessé par les tirs. Pour Karsenty, ce reportage relevait de la supercherie médiatique, du bidonnage en argot de métier.

Ces images, reprises par les télévisions du monde entier avaient soulevé une émotion planétaire, et porté gravement atteinte au crédit moral de l’Etat d’Israël et de son armée. Cet enfant, devenu icône, symbolisait la brutalité de la “soldatesque sioniste” contre les civils palestiniens désarmés.

(Lire la suite…)

La nation de Sitting Bull déclare son indépendance

Posted on Vendredi 23 mai 2008

Si c’est pour ne pas payer d’impots, je suis d’accord ! :-)

The Lakota Sioux Indians, whose ancestors include Sitting Bull, Red Cloud and Crazy Horse, have withdrawn from all treaties their forefathers signed with the U.S. government and have declared their independence. A delegation delivered the news to the State Department earlier this week.

1855 portrait of Sitting Bull by David Frances Barry, Library of Congress

Portions of Nebraska, South Dakota, North Dakota, Montana and Wyoming comprise Lakota country, and the tribe says that if the federal government doesn’t begin diplomatic discussions promptly, liens will be filed on property in the five-state region. Here’s the news release.

“We are no longer citizens of the United States of America and all those who live in the five-state area that encompasses our country are free to join us,” said Russell Means, a longtime Indian rights activist. “This is according to the laws of the United States, specifically Article 6 of the Constitution,” which states that treaties are the supreme law of the land. (Lire la suite…)

lagrette @ 14:35
Classé dans : Annonces and Guligulis et glouglous and eXc soutient
Cachez ce…

Posted on Vendredi 23 mai 2008

…corps momifié que  je ne saurais voir !

Un des musées les plus reputés du monde pour sa collection d’Ancienne Egypte, vient de prendre la décision de recouvrir les mommies  exposées au public après les plaintes de visiteurs qui étaient offensés par ces “corps” nus.

Avant

  Apres

lagrette @ 09:35
Classé dans : Bobologie et dhimmitude and LIBERTÉS
Top 10 ways to know if you are a Taliban

Posted on Mercredi 14 mai 2008

 10. YOU REFINE HEROIN FOR A LIVING, BUT YOU HAVE A MORAL
OBJECTION TO BEER.

9. YOU OWN A $300 MACHINE GUN AND A $5,000 ROCKET LAUNCHER,
BUT YOU CAN’T AFFORD SHOES.

8. YOU THINK VESTS COME IN 2 STYLES; BULLET PROOF AND SUICIDE.

7. YOU HAVE MORE WIVES THAN TEETH.

6. YOU CAN’T THINK OF ANYONE YOU HAVEN’T DECLARED JIHAD
AGAINST.

5. YOU CONSIDER TELEVISION DANGEROUS, BUT ROUTINELY CARRY
AMMUNITION IN YOUR ROBE.

4. YOU’VE BEEN ASKED, “DOES THIS BURKA MAKE MY ASS LOOK BIG?”

3. YOU WERE AMAZED TO DISCOVER THAT CELL PHONES HAVE USES
OTHER THAN SETTING OFF ROADSIDE BOMBS.

2. A COMMON COMPLIMENT IS, “I LOVE WHAT YOU’VE DONE WITH
YOUR CAVE.”

AND THE NUMBER 1 WAY TO TELL IF YOU MIGHT BE A MEMBER OF THE
TALIBAN

1. YOU WIPE YOUR ASS WITH YOUR BARE HAND, BUT CONSIDER
BACON UNCLEAN.

It would be funny…

Posted on Dimanche 11 mai 2008

if it were not so true !

lagrette @ 12:14
Classé dans : Présidentielle américaine 2008
Tout est dans le logo…

Posted on Vendredi 25 avril 2008

Le  Office of Government Commerce du Tresor britanique a dépensé  14 000 livres pour un nouveau  logo, a fait imprimer ses paillassons, ses stylos, etc… avant de le dévoiler à ses employés qui n’ont mis que quelques secondes à voir que si on le met dans l’autre sens, il est beaucoup plus drôle.

Commentaire du porte-parler de l’OGC : “It is true that it caused a few titters among some staff when viewed on its side, but on consideration we concluded that the effect was generic to the particular combination of the letters OGC - and it is not inappropriate to an organisation that’s looking to have a firm grip on Government spend.”

  •  

  • lagrette @ 08:54
    Classé dans : Guligulis et glouglous
    Sad, sad, sad…

    Posted on Vendredi 18 avril 2008

    Dans les grandes villes de la Côte Est les yuppies inscrivent leur gamin à la maternelle la mieux cotée dès sa conception pour lui donner toutes les chances d’ entrer à Harvard à 18 ans… Dans les quartiers moins favorisés, les parents d’un gamin de 4 ans se disputent pour savoir à quel gang leur gamin doit appartenir : Les deux extrêmes de l’Amérique…

    A couple fighting about which gang their 4-year-old toddler should join caused a public disturbance that resulted in the father’s arrest, Commerce City police said Thursday.On Saturday, Joseph Manzanares stormed into the Hollywood Video store where his girlfriend worked, threatened to kill her and knocked over several video displays and even a computer, Commerce City police Sgt. Joe Sandoval said.After he ran out of the store, police were called and the 19-year-old was arrested at his home.

    His girlfriend told police that they had been arguing about the upbringing of their son and which gang he should belong to. The teen mother, who is black, is a member of the Crips. Manzanares is Hispanic and belongs to the Westside Ballers gang, the woman said.”They have different ideas on how the baby should be raised. Basically, she said they cannot agree on which gang the baby would ‘claim,’” Sandoval said.Manzanares was charged with disorderly conduct, harassment, and domestic violence. He was transported to the Adams County Detention Facility.On Tuesday, he pleaded guilty to disorderly conduct and was sentenced to a year of probation. The misdemeanor harassment charge was dropped.

    lagrette @ 17:30
    Classé dans : La connerie humaine: sans limite and Posts in English
    La future madame Poutine ?

    Posted on Jeudi 17 avril 2008

    Il semblerait que Poutine veuille rivaliser avec Sarko… Il jette la vieille et en prend une neuve.

    Rumours are circulating in Moscow that Vladimir Putin has left his wife and is set to marry a former rhythmic gymnast less than half his age. The 56-year-old Russian president is said to have formed a relationship with the beautiful Alina Kabaeva, 24, and the couple have decided to tie the knot.

    lagrette @ 23:11
    Classé dans : Rumeurs, bruits et soupçons
    La récompense après l’attentat suicide

    Posted on Mercredi 16 avril 2008

    Je prends des risque à publier cet extrait de sermon d’un imam saoudien, Omar Al-Sweilem, décrivant l’ultime récompense réservée aux “heros” qui meurent pour le Jihad quand ils arrivent au paradis. C’est peut-être l’argument qui va enfin convaincre les hommes d’eXc  de la beauté de l’Islam et les pousser à la conversion :

    When we meet the black-eyed virgin with her black hair and white face – praised be He who created night and day. What hair! What a chest! What a mouth! What cheeks! What a figure! What breasts! What thighs! What legs! What whiteness! What softness! Without any creams – no Nivea, no vaseline. No nothing! … how soft will a black-eyed virgin be, when she comes to you so tall and with her beautiful face, her black hair and white face - praised be He who created night and day. …

    There is no god but Allah. He told us that if you entered one of the palaces, you would find ten black-eyed virgins sprawled on musk cushions. … When they see you, they will get up and run to you. Lucky is the one who gets to put her thumb in your hand. When they get hold of you, they will push you onto your back, on the musk cushions. They will push you onto your back, Jamal! Allah Akbar! I wish this on all people present here. He said that one of them would place her mouth on yours. Do whatever you want. Another one would press her cheek against yours, yet another would press her chest against yours, and the others would await their turn. There is no god but Allah. He told us that one black-eyed virgin would give you a glass of wine. Wine in Paradise is a reward for your good deeds. The wine of this world is destructive, but not the wine of the world to come.

    lagrette @ 23:28
    Classé dans : Du sexe and Islamisme et RATP/ROP
    Cout de la guerre en Iraq

    Posted on Mardi 8 avril 2008

    What Is the Cost of Freedom?   [Larry Kudlow]

    Surprise, surprise. Having failed to penetrate General Petraeus’s story about the great improvements on the ground in Iraq, liberals are now trying to make the case that the cost of the Iraq war may have somehow undermined the economy, and even caused the current slowdown. What complete and utter nonsense.

    First point: The U.S. has spent roughly $750 billion for the five-year war. Sure, that’s a lot of money. But run the numbers and the total cost works out to a miniscule 1 percent of the $63 trillion GDP over that time period. It’s miniscule.

    More important, the real question we ought to be asking ourselves is what is the cost of freedom? While the Left refuses to acknowledge it, the undeniable fact is that the United States homeland has not been attacked since September 11. Meanwhile, over in Iraq, al Qaeda and other extremist terrorist groups have been utterly routed by U.S. forces. It’s another fact the Left hates to acknowledge.

    Perhaps the anti-war forces should recall the portion of John F. Kennedy’s inaugural address, where he called on Americans to pay any price, and bear any burden, in order to preserve freedom, liberty, and democracy. Do these folks actually think 1 percent of GDP is too large a price, too heavy a burden? I sure hope not.

    And by the way, despite the current slowdown, during the five years of the Iraq war the U.S. economy has performed remarkably well. Real GDP has increased by 16 percent, or 3 percent annually. The unemployment rate has hovered below a historically low 5 percent for quite some time. Nearly 10 million jobs have been created. Household net worth has increased by $20 trillion. Industrial production has expanded by 13.5 percent.  Even home prices, despite the current correction, have increased by 20 percent.

    Lest we soon forget, anti-freedom, anti-capitalism jihadists were attempting to drive a dagger through our economy. Not only did they fail miserably on that front, they also failed to stem the rising tide of free-market capitalism throughout the world. Global GDP has averaged nearly 5 percent annually. The capitalization of the world’s stock market increased 159 percent — or $35 trillion. Meanwhile, new emerging-market economies saw their stock market index collectively rise by 223 percent.

    So with all respect, I say to Nobelist Joe Stiglitz and others of his ilk: You are wrong.

    lagrette @ 23:01
    Classé dans : De la guerre et de la paix and Politiques économiques and Posts in English
    Pulitzer Prize pour Michael Ramirez

    Posted on Lundi 7 avril 2008

    Il est tout a fait merite.

    lagrette @ 16:25
    Classé dans : Médias and Politique américaine
    Extrêmisme ? Quel extrêmisme ?

    Posted on Dimanche 6 avril 2008

     Un sondage rapporté par le journal Gulf Times, nous dit que 70% des musulmans des Pays Arabes, de l’Afrique du nord et du Levant pensent que l’importantce accordée à l’extrêmisme religieux est exagerée… pourtant parmi les  personnes interrogées, 50% d’entre elles connaissent quelqu’un ayant des idées extrêmistes en ce qui concerne la religion, 60% d’entre elles disent que la violence est justifiée en cas d’ interférences occidentales en pays musulman, et 55%  en cas de paroles ou de conduites offensantes.

    A YOUGOV poll commissioned by the Doha Debates has concluded that nearly one-third of all Arabs believe that Saudi Arabia is at greater risk from religious extremism than any other country in the world.
    The poll adds weight to the vote at a session of the Doha Debates held on March 3 in Doha, where the motion “This house believes that Muslims are failing to combat extremism”, was carried by more than 70% of the audience.
    In the YouGov survey, nearly half of all Arabs in the Gulf, Levant and North Africa said they have met someone who holds extreme religious views.
    Asked under what conditions violence is permissible, more than 60% cited Western interference in a Muslim country, while 55% said offensive words or behaviour was a trigger.
    More than half the respondents also believed that poor religious leadership is to blame for today’s extremism – although seven out of 10 said the size of the problem had been exaggerated.
    Eight out of 10 believed it provides an excuse for the West to interfere in Muslim countries.
    In the poll, conducted between March 18 and 23, views of 940 people across the Arab world were surveyed.

    lagrette @ 14:46
    Classé dans : Islamisme et RATP/ROP
    Ils ont piqué la Californie

    Posted on Vendredi 4 avril 2008

    Voilà une pub, diffusée au Mexique, qui ne va pas beaucoup plaire aux Gringos….  Go Smirnof !

    lagrette @ 11:59
    Classé dans : Tout à fait hors sujet
    Nouvelle victime du global warming

    Posted on Vendredi 4 avril 2008

    Ted Turner a visiblement subi un ramollissement cérébral du à la chaleur ambiante. Dans une interview avec Charlie Rose sur NPR ( un peu comme notre France Culture), le fondateur de CNN et l’ex-mari de Jane Fonda a déclaré que si rien n’était fait pour combattre le réchauffement du climat, dans 30 ou 40 ans, ceux d’entre nous qui auront survécu aux famines et autres désastres dus à la chaleur seront obligés d’êre canibales pour survivre.

    “Not doing it will be catastrophic. We’ll be eight degrees hotter in ten, not ten but 30 or 40 years and basically none of the crops will grow. Most of the people will have died and the rest of us will be cannibals. Civilization will have broken down. The few people left will be living in a failed state like Somalia or Sudan, and living conditions will be intolerable. The droughts will be so bad there’ll be no more corn growning.”

    Il faut lire les commentaires des auditeurs de NPR pour voir à quel point cette épidémie de cerveaux rammolis fait des ravages. On se croirait sur les forums du Monde .

    lagrette @ 11:46
    Classé dans : Réchauffement et science
    If a woman were president

    Posted on Mercredi 2 avril 2008


    Gory nightmare

    Posted on Dimanche 30 mars 2008

    J’espère que ça restera un cauchemar et ne deviendra pas une réalité…

    Il semblerait que les grands pontes du parti démocrate sont en train d’examiner la possibilité de la nomination d’Al Gore comme candidat démocrate pour l’élection présidentielle, pour sauver le parti d’une guerre fratrticide entre les partisans d’Obama et ceux de Clinton. Gore serait le candidat du compromis, accepté par les deux candidats actuels.

    Senior Democrats mull Al Gore’s nomination
    By Tim Shipman in Washington

    Last Updated: 2:23am BST 30/03/2008

    Plans for Al Gore to take the Democratic presidential nomination as the saviour of a bitterly divided party are being actively discussed by senior figures and aides to the former vice-president.

    The bloody civil war between Hillary Clinton and Barack Obama has left many Democrats convinced that neither can deliver a knockout blow to the other and that both have been so damaged that they risk losing November’s election to the Republican nominee, John McCain.

    Former Vice President Al Gore speaks at a news conference: Senior Democrats mull Al Gore's nomination
    Former aides to Al Gore now believe he could emerge as a compromise candidate

    Former Gore aides now believe he could emerge as a compromise candidate acceptable to both camps at the party’s convention in Denver during the last week of August.

    Two former Gore campaign officials have told The Sunday Telegraph that a scenario first mapped out by members of Mr Gore’s inner circle last May now has a sporting chance of coming true.

    Mr Gore, who was Bill Clinton’s vice-president and has since won a Nobel Peace Prize and an Oscar for his work on green issues, remains an influential figure eight years after he beat George W Bush in the popular vote but lost the White House after the Florida recount fiasco.

    (Lire la suite…)

    lagrette @ 14:54
    Classé dans : Posts in English and Présidentielle américaine 2008
    Interview de Geert Wilders sur Fox, en français

    Posted on Samedi 29 mars 2008


    Merci Bivouac-id