<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Commentaires sur : Crise financière: Attention, une folie peut en cacher une autre (It’s the government, stupid!)</title>
	<atom:link href="http://extremecentre.org/2008/09/23/crise-des-marches-financiers-qui-nous-delivrera-des-regulateurs-it%e2%80%99s-the-government-stupid/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://extremecentre.org/2008/09/23/crise-des-marches-financiers-qui-nous-delivrera-des-regulateurs-it%e2%80%99s-the-government-stupid/</link>
	<description>Contre l'extrême droite et l'extrême gauche, il y a l'extrême centre</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 30 Jul 2010 10:59:20 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>Par : jc durbant</title>
		<link>http://extremecentre.org/2008/09/23/crise-des-marches-financiers-qui-nous-delivrera-des-regulateurs-it%e2%80%99s-the-government-stupid/comment-page-1/#comment-206790</link>
		<dc:creator>jc durbant</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 25 Sep 2008 19:57:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://extremecentre.org/2008/09/23/crise-des-marches-financiers-qui-nous-delivrera-des-regulateurs-it%e2%80%99s-the-government-stupid/#comment-206790</guid>
		<description>Voir aussi confirmation, sur le blog d&#039;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.humanevents.com/article.php?id=28714&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;Ann Coulter&lt;/a&gt;, de la manière dont nos belles âmes démocrates, depuis Clinton jusqu&#039;aux potes à Obama, ont imposé à l&#039;industrie hypothécaire les bonnes intentions qui valent aujourd&#039;hui aux classes moyennes de devoir payer les centaines de millions de dollars nécessaires pour renflouer leurs principaux soutiens: les &quot;riches banquiers de Wall Street et les RMIstes&quot;:

&quot;the subprime mortgage crisis currently roiling the financial markets. (…) was caused by political correctness being forced on the mortgage lending industry in the Clinton era.

Before the Democrats&#039; affirmative action lending policies became an embarrassment, the Los Angeles Times reported that, starting in 1992, a majority-Democratic Congress &quot;mandated that Fannie and Freddie increase their purchases of mortgages for low-income and medium-income borrowers. Operating under that requirement, Fannie Mae, in particular, has been aggressive and creative in stimulating minority gains.&quot;

Under Clinton, the entire federal government put massive pressure on banks to grant more mortgages to the poor and minorities. Clinton&#039;s secretary of Housing and Urban Development, Andrew Cuomo, investigated Fannie Mae for racial discrimination and proposed that 50 percent of Fannie Mae&#039;s and Freddie Mac&#039;s portfolio be made up of loans to low- to moderate-income borrowers by the year 2001.

Instead of looking at &quot;outdated criteria,&quot; such as the mortgage applicant&#039;s credit history and ability to make a down payment, banks were encouraged to consider nontraditional measures of credit-worthiness, such as having a good jump shot or having a missing child named &quot;Caylee.&quot;

Threatening lawsuits, Clinton&#039;s Federal Reserve demanded that banks treat welfare payments and unemployment benefits as valid income sources to qualify for a mortgage. That isn&#039;t a joke -- it&#039;s a fact.

When Democrats controlled both the executive and legislative branches, political correctness was given a veto over sound business practices.

In 1999, liberals were bragging about extending affirmative action to the financial sector. Los Angeles Times reporter Ron Brownstein hailed the Clinton administration&#039;s affirmative action lending policies as one of the &quot;hidden success stories&quot; of the Clinton administration, saying that &quot;black and Latino homeownership has surged to the highest level ever recorded.&quot;

Meanwhile, economists were screaming from the rooftops that the Democrats were forcing mortgage lenders to issue loans that would fail the moment the housing market slowed and deadbeat borrowers couldn&#039;t get out of their loans by selling their houses.

A decade later, the housing bubble burst and, as predicted, food-stamp-backed mortgages collapsed. Democrats set an affirmative action time-bomb and now it&#039;s gone off.

In Bush&#039;s first year in office, the White House chief economist, N. Gregory Mankiw, warned that the government&#039;s &quot;implicit subsidy&quot; of Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac, combined with loans to unqualified borrowers, was creating a huge risk for the entire financial system.

Rep. Barney Frank denounced Mankiw, saying he had no &quot;concern about housing.&quot; How dare you oppose suicidal loans to people who can&#039;t repay them! The New York Times reported that Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac were &quot;under heavy assault by the Republicans,&quot; but these entities still had &quot;important political allies&quot; in the Democrats.

Now, at a cost of hundreds of billions of dollars, middle-class taxpayers are going to be forced to bail out the Democrats&#039; two most important constituent groups: rich Wall Street bankers and welfare recipients.&quot;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Voir aussi confirmation, sur le blog d&#8217;<a href="http://www.humanevents.com/article.php?id=28714" rel="nofollow">Ann Coulter</a>, de la manière dont nos belles âmes démocrates, depuis Clinton jusqu&#8217;aux potes à Obama, ont imposé à l&#8217;industrie hypothécaire les bonnes intentions qui valent aujourd&#8217;hui aux classes moyennes de devoir payer les centaines de millions de dollars nécessaires pour renflouer leurs principaux soutiens: les &laquo;&nbsp;riches banquiers de Wall Street et les RMIstes&nbsp;&raquo;:</p>
<p>&laquo;&nbsp;the subprime mortgage crisis currently roiling the financial markets. (…) was caused by political correctness being forced on the mortgage lending industry in the Clinton era.</p>
<p>Before the Democrats&#8217; affirmative action lending policies became an embarrassment, the Los Angeles Times reported that, starting in 1992, a majority-Democratic Congress &laquo;&nbsp;mandated that Fannie and Freddie increase their purchases of mortgages for low-income and medium-income borrowers. Operating under that requirement, Fannie Mae, in particular, has been aggressive and creative in stimulating minority gains.&nbsp;&raquo;</p>
<p>Under Clinton, the entire federal government put massive pressure on banks to grant more mortgages to the poor and minorities. Clinton&#8217;s secretary of Housing and Urban Development, Andrew Cuomo, investigated Fannie Mae for racial discrimination and proposed that 50 percent of Fannie Mae&#8217;s and Freddie Mac&#8217;s portfolio be made up of loans to low- to moderate-income borrowers by the year 2001.</p>
<p>Instead of looking at &laquo;&nbsp;outdated criteria,&nbsp;&raquo; such as the mortgage applicant&#8217;s credit history and ability to make a down payment, banks were encouraged to consider nontraditional measures of credit-worthiness, such as having a good jump shot or having a missing child named &laquo;&nbsp;Caylee.&nbsp;&raquo;</p>
<p>Threatening lawsuits, Clinton&#8217;s Federal Reserve demanded that banks treat welfare payments and unemployment benefits as valid income sources to qualify for a mortgage. That isn&#8217;t a joke &#8212; it&#8217;s a fact.</p>
<p>When Democrats controlled both the executive and legislative branches, political correctness was given a veto over sound business practices.</p>
<p>In 1999, liberals were bragging about extending affirmative action to the financial sector. Los Angeles Times reporter Ron Brownstein hailed the Clinton administration&#8217;s affirmative action lending policies as one of the &laquo;&nbsp;hidden success stories&nbsp;&raquo; of the Clinton administration, saying that &laquo;&nbsp;black and Latino homeownership has surged to the highest level ever recorded.&nbsp;&raquo;</p>
<p>Meanwhile, economists were screaming from the rooftops that the Democrats were forcing mortgage lenders to issue loans that would fail the moment the housing market slowed and deadbeat borrowers couldn&#8217;t get out of their loans by selling their houses.</p>
<p>A decade later, the housing bubble burst and, as predicted, food-stamp-backed mortgages collapsed. Democrats set an affirmative action time-bomb and now it&#8217;s gone off.</p>
<p>In Bush&#8217;s first year in office, the White House chief economist, N. Gregory Mankiw, warned that the government&#8217;s &laquo;&nbsp;implicit subsidy&nbsp;&raquo; of Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac, combined with loans to unqualified borrowers, was creating a huge risk for the entire financial system.</p>
<p>Rep. Barney Frank denounced Mankiw, saying he had no &laquo;&nbsp;concern about housing.&nbsp;&raquo; How dare you oppose suicidal loans to people who can&#8217;t repay them! The New York Times reported that Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac were &laquo;&nbsp;under heavy assault by the Republicans,&nbsp;&raquo; but these entities still had &laquo;&nbsp;important political allies&nbsp;&raquo; in the Democrats.</p>
<p>Now, at a cost of hundreds of billions of dollars, middle-class taxpayers are going to be forced to bail out the Democrats&#8217; two most important constituent groups: rich Wall Street bankers and welfare recipients.&nbsp;&raquo;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Par : jc durbant</title>
		<link>http://extremecentre.org/2008/09/23/crise-des-marches-financiers-qui-nous-delivrera-des-regulateurs-it%e2%80%99s-the-government-stupid/comment-page-1/#comment-206718</link>
		<dc:creator>jc durbant</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 24 Sep 2008 04:46:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://extremecentre.org/2008/09/23/crise-des-marches-financiers-qui-nous-delivrera-des-regulateurs-it%e2%80%99s-the-government-stupid/#comment-206718</guid>
		<description>Comme le rappelle &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.iht.com/articles/2008/09/23/opinion/edbrooks.php?pass=true&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;Brooks&lt;/a&gt;, le moment est effectivement historique mais pas du tout comme il semble le croire (qui a vraiment besoin de ce &quot;Corporatisme Progressiste&quot; tiré des profondeurs des tiroirs des conseillers du joueur de pipeau démocrate?) et plutôt, comme il n&#039;est apparemment pas prêt à le reconnaitre,... tout simplement reaganien!

&quot;Ainsi nous sommes arrivés à l’un de ces grands moments de l’histoire. L’agitation financière globale a arraché presque tout le monde à leurs catégories idéologiques normales. La pression de la réalité nous oblige à repenser le rapport entre le gouvernement et l’économie.&quot;

David Brooks

&quot;Le gouvernement n’est pas la solution à nos problèmes. Le gouvernement est le problème.&quot; 

Ronald Reagan</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Comme le rappelle <a href="http://www.iht.com/articles/2008/09/23/opinion/edbrooks.php?pass=true" rel="nofollow">Brooks</a>, le moment est effectivement historique mais pas du tout comme il semble le croire (qui a vraiment besoin de ce &laquo;&nbsp;Corporatisme Progressiste&nbsp;&raquo; tiré des profondeurs des tiroirs des conseillers du joueur de pipeau démocrate?) et plutôt, comme il n&#8217;est apparemment pas prêt à le reconnaitre,&#8230; tout simplement reaganien!</p>
<p>&laquo;&nbsp;Ainsi nous sommes arrivés à l’un de ces grands moments de l’histoire. L’agitation financière globale a arraché presque tout le monde à leurs catégories idéologiques normales. La pression de la réalité nous oblige à repenser le rapport entre le gouvernement et l’économie.&nbsp;&raquo;</p>
<p>David Brooks</p>
<p>&laquo;&nbsp;Le gouvernement n’est pas la solution à nos problèmes. Le gouvernement est le problème.&nbsp;&raquo; </p>
<p>Ronald Reagan</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
