Pauvre pauvre Hussein ( dit le K comme pour Kadrik …)
C’est-y-pas beau les zyluzions ?
Une fois n’est pas coutume mais plus les fans club europeens des candidats democrates sont hysteriques dans leur idolatries et plus leur cheri se ramasse ! Clinton etait passe relativement inapercu a l’epoque ( car les memes pensaient a une reelection triomphale de Bush pere …)

>:-|

Je ne vois pas le rapport entre la couverture médiatique de Palin (enfin ils ne font que leur boulot autant qu’ils l’ont fait pour Obama; et il faut arrêter la victimisation féministe, cela faisait même rire Palin lorsque Hillary l’a fait…) et les démocrates.

Montrez-moi ne serait-ce qu’une ad d’Obama qui dit des mensonges sur son adversaire.

McCain ne fait que cela

Une fois de plus les républicains, avec le Spin doctor Rove aux manettes, montrent qu’ils sont prêt à tout pour gagner le pouvoir.

Des menteurs et des escorcs depuis les années 80.

Au moins les démocrates ne mentent pas !

Blizzard of Lies
By PAUL KRUGMAN – NYTimes – 9.12.2008

Did you hear about how Barack Obama wants to have sex education in kindergarten, and called Sarah Palin a pig? Did you hear about how Ms. Palin told Congress, “Thanks, but no thanks” when it wanted to buy Alaska a Bridge to Nowhere?

These stories have two things in common: they’re all claims recently made by the McCain campaign — and they’re all out-and-out lies.

Dishonesty is nothing new in politics. I spent much of 2000 — my first year at The Times — trying to alert readers to the blatant dishonesty of the Bush campaign’s claims about taxes, spending and Social Security.

But I can’t think of any precedent, at least in America, for the blizzard of lies since the Republican convention. The Bush campaign’s lies in 2000 were artful — you needed some grasp of arithmetic to realize that you were being conned. This year, however, the McCain campaign keeps making assertions that anyone with an Internet connection can disprove in a minute, and repeating these assertions over and over again.

Take the case of the Bridge to Nowhere, which supposedly gives Ms. Palin credentials as a reformer. Well, when campaigning for governor, Ms. Palin didn’t say “no thanks” — she was all for the bridge, even though it had already become a national scandal, insisting that she would “not allow the spinmeisters to turn this project or any other into something that’s so negative.”

Oh, and when she finally did decide to cancel the project, she didn’t righteously reject a handout from Washington: she accepted the handout, but spent it on something else. You see, long before she decided to cancel the bridge, Congress had told Alaska that it could keep the federal money originally earmarked for that project and use it elsewhere.

So the whole story of Ms. Palin’s alleged heroic stand against wasteful spending is fiction.

Or take the story of Mr. Obama’s alleged advocacy of kindergarten sex-ed. In reality, he supported legislation calling for “age and developmentally appropriate education”; in the case of young children, that would have meant guidance to help them avoid sexual predators.

And then there’s the claim that Mr. Obama’s use of the ordinary metaphor “putting lipstick on a pig” was a sexist smear, and on and on.

Why do the McCain people think they can get away with this stuff? Well, they’re probably counting on the common practice in the news media of being “balanced” at all costs. You know how it goes: If a politician says that black is white, the news report doesn’t say that he’s wrong, it reports that “some Democrats say” that he’s wrong. Or a grotesque lie from one side is paired with a trivial misstatement from the other, conveying the impression that both sides are equally dirty.

They’re probably also counting on the prevalence of horse-race reporting, so that instead of the story being “McCain campaign lies,” it becomes “Obama on defensive in face of attacks.”

Still, how upset should we be about the McCain campaign’s lies? I mean, politics ain’t beanbag, and all that.

One answer is that the muck being hurled by the McCain campaign is preventing a debate on real issues — on whether the country really wants, for example, to continue the economic policies of the last eight years.

But there’s another answer, which may be even more important: how a politician campaigns tells you a lot about how he or she would govern.

I’m not talking about the theory, often advanced as a defense of horse-race political reporting, that the skills needed to run a winning campaign are the same as those needed to run the country. The contrast between the Bush political team’s ruthless effectiveness and the heckuva job done by the Bush administration is living, breathing, bumbling, and, in the case of the emerging Interior Department scandal, coke-snorting and bed-hopping proof to the contrary.

I’m talking, instead, about the relationship between the character of a campaign and that of the administration that follows. Thus, the deceptive and dishonest 2000 Bush-Cheney campaign provided an all-too-revealing preview of things to come. In fact, my early suspicion that we were being misled about the threat from Iraq came from the way the political tactics being used to sell the war resembled the tactics that had earlier been used to sell the Bush tax cuts.

And now the team that hopes to form the next administration is running a campaign that makes Bush-Cheney 2000 look like something out of a civics class. What does that say about how that team would run the country?

What it says, I’d argue, is that the Obama campaign is wrong to suggest that a McCain-Palin administration would just be a continuation of Bush-Cheney. If the way John McCain and Sarah Palin are campaigning is any indication, it would be much, much worse.

Here are the new 2008-2009 hurricane guidelines…..

As we watch the progress of Hurricane Ike, the following are the companies
guidelines based upon the hurricane’s intensity:

Hurricane Category #1 -
No excuse for being late to work. Leave earlier to give extra time to avoid
fallen trees and limbs.

Hurricane Category #2 -
Due to the horizontal rain, you may wear jeans. We also advise you wear
goggles.

Hurricane Category #3 -
Whereas most of the area will be flooded, we suggest you avoid wearing open
toe sandals when coming to work. Canoes will be provided to those in need of
crossing the street to get to the office building safely without getting
wet.

Hurricane Category #4 -
More than likely, there will be no electricity, so make sure you charge the
batteries in the lap tops. We will also have manual typewriters available to
all staff members that forget to charge the batteries. Ladies, please take
extra caution and wear water-proof make-up if Category 4 or above.

Hurricane Category #5 -
Velcro will be provided to keep you attached to your chairs when the windows
blow out of the building. For those that survive, we will have chocolate
cake and ice-cream at 3:00 PM in the kitchen.

Tous les ecureils ont sortis leurs gilets de sauvetages, et emporte leurs reserves de Pecans en haut des arbres.
++++++++++++
Blague a part , on vous croise les doigts ……….Reponse Samedi ?

Sinon Matt Damon est finalement trés loin de Will Hunting car s’il suffit de publier ses memoires pour sembler palier l’inexpérience de Barack et ainsi l’impressionner, C’est décevant.

Petite ville ou pas, état peu peuplé ou pas, memoires ou pas, Sarah n’a pas de leçons a recevoir de Barack de ce coté-là, ni même de Matt.

Cela dit s’il suffit d’une biographie pour épater les star d’hollywood, je suis sur que l’on peut en faire une de geniale en moins d’un mois pour Sarah Palin. Je suis même certain que Lagrette en aurait une d’emballante à proposer à Matt Damon

Très bon Matt Dumon.

J’aime mieux ce Hollywood la

Hollywood, lien correct

Apres coup, oui… Mais ca renforce l’idee qu’il est extremement gaffeur, comme quand il a dit hier, qu’Hillary aurait ete une meilleure VP que lui…
Sur Jay Leno( Tonight Show), la semaine derniere, ils ont passe une petite video ( qu’ils n’avaient pas traffiquee pour la rendre drole ) ou Obama et Biden etaient filmes ensemble et Biden parlaient a une troisieme personne et racontait des apparement des betises (je n’ai meme pas compris de quoi il parlait) et Obama regardait Biden avec un air completement incredule et desespere.Je n’arrive pas a retrouver la video en question, mais c’etait d’un comique ! C’est d’ailleurs pour ca que c’est arrive sur le Tonight Show

Le communiste gris ne réussira pas à cacher indéfiniment qu’il est communiste, et qu’il ne se trouve là où il est que parce qu’il est gris.

Joe Biden le gaffeur , pas etonnant qu’ils le cachent et l’empechent de parler : Avant hier a un meeting electoral, il a voulu remercier les grands pontes democrates qui l’accueillaient dans leur ville, et quand il a nomme le state representative, il a rajoute « Stand up, Chuck, stand up » pour que tout le monde puisse le voir, avant de se souvenir que le Chuck en question etait en chaise roulante…
Biden Gaffe; Asked Wheelchair Bound Senator To Stand

Oui, il aurait pu répondre : je n’ai pas à vous donner les noms de mes amis, surtout accolés à leurs opinions politiques. Mais ça doit être dur d’avoir la présence d’esprit pour répondre toujours du tac au tac.

Je veux dire qu’Obama a assez bien tenu le coup, sauf pour l’histoire de « Vous avez des amis de droite? »

> pas autant que les républicains l’aimeraient, mais bon

Mais je comprends plus, tu viens de dire que tu le trouvais trop agressif, O’Reilly

On panique, j’ai l’impression:
S.C. Dem chair: Palin primary qualification is she hasn’t had an abortion

Lipstick on a pig
On veut bien croire que c’est une expression courante, mais après le succès du lipstick et du pitbull de Palin, c’était pour le moins maladroit de la part d’Obama, ça risque de lui coûter cher.

C’est assez typique, l’extrême gauche n’aime pas trop le débat, voir Le Monde diplomatique, où jamais un opposant n’est invité à s’exprimer, jamais un débat n’est organisé dans les colonnes, ou encore Daniel Mermet à France Inter, émission Là bas si j’y suis, aucune voix discordante, jamais, que des gauchistes qui ronronnent. Mais Obama n’est pas d’extrême gauche, il est rompu au débat, non ?

Il est obligé d’y aller ? Je veux dire, Obama, devant O’Reilly ?

@james même moi, je le trouve trop aggressif, mais sinon, Obie s’évade..

@lagrette: mon voisin m’a donné 4 arbres, mais aucun sur la maison. La ville est dévastée

Contente de vous revoir parmi nous; je commencais presque a me demander si vous aviez coule !!!