Je caca, tu caca, il caca.
Extreme caca
C’est dingue, hein, cette odeur extreme. On y retrouve une quantité extreme d’étrons. Et encore ! la plupart sont trop liquides pour se qualifier d’étrons…
Extreme diarhée. Voila un beau titre pour ce blogue.
Je vous imite bien quand même, n’est ce pas ?
+++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++=
Certainement pas ! Nous decrivons un etat de fait , une evidence factuelle et vous vous en glorifiez en pateaugeant dedans , c’est pas du tout la meme chose ! Surtout qu’on se demande ce que vous foutez sur un Forum quelconque , a fortiori celui de l’ImM onde - PO : vous n’avez strictement RIEN a dire si ce n’est empuantir les debats de votre “presence”

Dites,jeune et beau Michael. comment transforme-t-on quelqu’un en confetti ?
+++++++++++++++
Mais sautez dans un avion et venez me rendre visite , grand courageux au pseudo a pseudo ! On vous fera une demonstration en live , vous apprecierez certainement

Dites,jeune et beau Michael. comment transforme-t-on quelqu’un en confetti ?

Zaimez pas répondre aux questions relatives à vos messages ?

Dites,
jeune et beau Michael. comment transforme-t-on quelqu’un en confetti ?

Adefdromil

En confetti ? Mais non

Compliqué les confettis. Vous savez, ces palestino-machins ont du sang (oui, oui). Donc, en les confettisant, vous allez mouiller partout. Puis ca pue.

Vous pourriez leur retirer leur sang. Rabbins, Imams et autres thanatologues chirurgiens pourraient vous aider à trouver une solution moins humide

Mais perso, je doute de la possibilité d’industrialiser la solution définitive à la prolifération de cafards palestiniens sur la base de leur confettisation.

Il faut revenir à la base, aux first principles, aux trucs qui ont fait leurs preuves. Avec un peu d’efforts, vous pourriez redémarrer les chambres à gaz d’Auschwitz et construire un train direct Gaza-Auschwitz et zou le tour est joué. Je vous assure que ce sera moins cher et plus facile à mettre en oeuvre que votre proposition de confettisation

A propos d’etiquette ds le dos, c’est bien de vous ca: “Ce blog sioniste met là “????
Au numero 177 sur “Quand l’Amerique…..”

Ram Zenit, c’est un art qui en vaut la peine que d’écouter une personne sans lui mettre d’étiquettes sur le dos.

Y’a pas que les soi-disant “Palestiniens” :

http://www.washingtoninstitute.org/templateC10.php?CID=3

Turkey Bows

By Söner Cagaptay, Los Angeles Times, August 19, 2008

Praying in Istanbul’s Blue Mosque on Friday, I witnessed firsthand Iranian President Mahmoud Ahmadinejad’s international publicity coup.

Ahmadinejad’s visit produced little in terms of substantive policy; the signing of a multibillion-dollar natural gas pipeline deal was put off. But Ahmadinejad got something just as valuable: a chance to spin his own image, court popularity and bash the United States and Israel.

I’ve long been fond of the Blue Mosque because it is where, many years ago, I attended my first Friday prayers. Last Friday, though, I felt uncomfortable in the prayer hall, where I found myself in front of God but next to Ahmadinejad, who turned the ritual into a political show.

Departing from established practice of having visiting Muslim heads of state pray in a smaller mosque in Istanbul, the government allowed Ahmadinejad to pray in the Blue Mosque, Turkey’s symbol of tolerant Ottoman Islam. With permission from Turkish authorities, he also allowed Iranian television to videotape him during the entire prayer, in violation of Islamic tradition, which requires quiet and intimate communion between God and the faithful. There was so much commotion around Ahmadinejad that the imam had to chide the congregants. Then, as he left the mosque, Ahmadinejad got out of his car to encourage a crowd of about 300 to chant, “Death to Israel! Death to America!”

Even without this behavior, any visit from a leader representing an authoritarian, anti-Western autocracy would have created controversy in Turkey just a few years ago. Not today. The ruling Justice and Development Party, or AKP, government not only opened the Blue Mosque to Ahmadinejad but accommodated his refusal to pay respects at the mausoleum of Kemal Ataturk, the founder of modern, secular Turkey — a major violation of protocol for an official visit.

In 1996, when Iran’s president, Hashemi Rafsanjani, refused to go to Ataturk’s mausoleum, snubbing Turkey’s identity as a secular pro-Western state, it led to a public outcry and sharp criticism of Iran. Relations soured. When the Iranian ambassador suggested a few months later that Turkey should follow Sharia law, he was forced to leave the country.

This time, though, the AKP government has taken a different stance, playing down the diplomatic insult. It moved the meeting from the capital, Ankara, to Istanbul and labeled it a “working” meeting rather than an official visit. Yet all sorts of AKP officials flocked to Istanbul to meet with the Iranian president.

Turkish Foreign Minister Ali Babacan asked the Turkish public to ignore the snub and instead “focus on the big picture.” It is the “big picture,” though, that is most disconcerting. By extending an invitation to Ahmadinejad, the first such move by any NATO or European Union member country, Turkey has broken ranks with the West. The West can no longer take Turkey for granted as a staunch ally against Tehran.

In the past, Turkey stood with the West, especially after the 1979 Islamist revolution in Iran. Also, Tehran gave refuge to the Kurdistan Workers Party, or PKK, which carried out terror attacks in Turkey from bases in Iran. Since the Iraq war began, however, Iran has shifted tactics to win Turkey’s heart. While the U.S. delayed taking action, Iran actually bombed PKK camps in northern Iraq.

Meanwhile, since the AKP assumed power in Turkey in 2002, bilateral visits with Iran have boomed; Ahmadinejad’s trip crowns dozens of visits by high-level officials. Trade has boomed as well, increasing from $1.2 billion in 2002 to $8 billion today. And even though the two countries didn’t formalize the deal last week, plans are still going forward for a $3.5-billion Turkish investment in Iranian gas fields — this at a time when the West is adopting financial sanctions against Iran to cripple Tehran’s ability to make a nuclear bomb. If there were any doubts about a Turkish-Iranian rapprochement, they were laid to rest last week: During Ahmadinejad’s visit, the two countries agreed to make 2009 an “Iran-Turkey year of culture” — marked by regular cultural and political programs and exchanges — to bring the two countries closer.

Ahmadinejad’s visit also speaks volumes about the future of Turkish-U.S. ties regarding Iran. According to a recent opinion poll in Turkey, when asked what the country should do in the event of a U.S. attack against Iran, only 4% of respondents said Turkey should support the U.S., while 33% wanted to back Iran and 63% chose neutrality.

As I shared the canopy of the Blue Mosque’s divine dome with Ahmadinejad, I could not help but ponder how far Turkish foreign policy has shifted since 2002. Before, Turkey picked allies based on shared values — democracy, Western identity, secular politics and the principle of open society — that appeared to reflect the Turkish soul. Iran has not become a pro-Western, secular democracy since 1996, nor have Tehran’s mullahs accepted gender equality or the idea of a free society. Yet Ankara has had a change of heart toward Tehran. Years from now, Ahmadinejad’s visit to Istanbul will be remembered as the tipping point at which the West lost Turkey, and Turkey lost its soul.

Soner Cagaptay is a senior fellow at the Washington Institute for Near East Policy and a visiting professor at Bahcesehir University in Istanbul.

Tout à fait d’accord avec cet article, sauf sur le souhait final. L’éveil des consciences doit se faire, mais peut et doit se faire autrement que par la mort d’hommes, français ou afghans.
Pour ce faire le très serviable Michael nous a révélé là un site intéressant. on peut y lire dans l’article: “Balles tragiques à Kaboul : 10 morts”, le paragraphe suivant:

“Les Taliban ne datent pas d’hier. Ils datent même de l’époque où l’Occident les choyait tellement qu’à la fin on ne savait plus quoi leur offrir pour Noël. « Ils ont déjà tout, l’argent, le soutien de l’Occident via le Pakistan, les armes sophistiquées… ». Mais les Taliban combattaient un ennemi encore plus terrible : les communistes. Pas les communistes soviétiques, qui ne sont arrivés que plus tard, mais les communistes Afghans, qui avaient pris le pouvoir. Qui avaient supprimé la ségrégation des sexes dans les écoles. Ce qui veut dire que les filles avaient AUSSI désormais le droit d’aller à l’école. Même que des maitres d’écoles coupables d’enseigner à des filles se voyaient écarteler (pas beau à voir) sur la place centrale d’un village reculé et contrôlé par nos amis de l’époque, les Taliban.”

On voit là que quand Sarkosy a prétendu se soucier du sort des femmes là-bas, c’était vraiment l’argument de circonstance. De plus quand il a dit combattre le terrorisme, on l’a vu bien nerveux (je veux dire plus que d’habitude). C’est qu’il sait, aussi bien que son ami Bush, que les taliban n’en sont pas responsables, mais ses amis largement.

Si jc durbant veut comprendre pourquoi cette guerre: il y a un projet de pipe line à travers le pays, l’isolation diplomatique et militaire de l’Iran, et la culture du pavot qu’interdisaient les taliban et dont le traffic aide bien les caisses noires de la CIA.